Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01030
Original file (PD2013 01030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE: PD1301030
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140702
SEPARATION DATE: 20080123


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E4 (11C10/Mortar-man) medically separated for a back condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain with spondylolysis of the L5 region” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain rated analogously to lumbrical strain” as unfitting, rated 10% citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “When I was being medically discharged I thought I Fractured my back as a kid. But going through the VA process and getting old medical records it say I DID NOT FRACTURE MY BACK. I have had pain in my back ever since I got in the Tracked Vehicle accident (113 mortar track) I have statement from fellow soldiers stating the accident and that I wasn’t the same after the accident. I was somebody who was in the best shape of there [sic] life before the accident.” The CI included additional remarks in Block 15 of his application and these were reviewed by the Board and considered in its recommendations.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting back condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20071212
 VA - (based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Low Back Pain Rated Analogously to Lumbrical Strain with Atraumatic Onset 5299-5237 10% Back Injury 5237 NSC* STR
Other x 0
 NSC x 3 STR
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 0%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 90225 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ).
*VARD dated 20110519 increased to 10%.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Board members first noted an anatomical inconsistency with the PEB’s verbiage of “lumbrical” and assumed the intended was to utilize “‘lumbosacral” instead.
Chronic Low Back Pain: Absent direct trauma, the CI first reported low back pain (LBP) while in basic training in January 2006 and, persisted throughout the balance of his career. He reported sharp LBP with stiffness and spasm, worse at night and with increased activities. The STR noted a gymnastic accident resulting in an L-5 compression fracture prior to service entry in 2005. Radiologic workup revealed minimal lumbosacral degenerative changes without evidence of prior lumbar (compression) fracture. In October 2007, he struck his low back against a hatch on a tactical vehicle; increasing his prior LBP symptoms. Multiple treatment modalities (including physical therapy and multiple medications) were pursued and the first temporary profile was issued in March 2007. Absent neurologic abnormality, surgery was not indicated. Few STR entries documented low back tenderness, back spasms, painful motion with occasional altered gait. There were no periods of incapacitation. At the MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) examination on 26 November 2007; 2 months prior to separation, the CI reported a sharp/stabbing intermittent LBP associated with spasms, localized to the mid L5-S1 area, aggravated with activity and minimally relieved with rest. There was no comment in regards to any associated radicular symptoms. Strength, motor, and sensory exams were normal. Lumbar X-rays were unchanged from prior exams. The physical revealed low lumbar tenderness and limited painful motion. Range-of-motion (ROM) was decreased at flexion “approximately” 60 degrees (normal 90 degrees) and combined ROM 170 degrees (normal 240 degrees). Eight months earlier to the NARSUM, there was an STR note that revealed forward flexion of the low back to 70 degrees. There was no VA Compensation and Pension examination for review and the VARD indicated that the CI failed to show for his scheduled appointment on 3 February 2009.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. Although the service and VA titled the unfitting back condition differently, they both utilized (in various combinations) the same 5237 code (lumbosacral strain) and rated 10% (not service-connected by the VA by virtue of an appointment “no show.”) Board members first agreed that sufficient evidence of painful motion was present to justify the PEB’s 10% rating IAW §4.59. The service examination also revealed compensable ROM which was recorded as an “approximate” degree angle that was directly at the cusp for a higher rating level. The CI’s recorded forward flexion of the thoracolumbar spine as “approximately 60 degrees” depicts pure speculation in determining a precise measurement of that less than or equal to 60 degrees (equivalent rating of 20%), or greater than 60 degrees (equivalent rating of 10%). IAW VASRD §4.71a and by Board convention, each ROM measurement is rounded to the nearest 5 degrees (reference Note 5 of the general spine formula) and therefore, any actual flexion measurement of 58 through 62 degrees would in fact be 60 degrees for rating purposes and that of 63 through 67 degrees would equate to 65 degrees. In consideration of the totality of evidence as well as Board discussions that centered about limited or absent objective findings such as persistent active spasms or consistent altered gait coupled with prior documentation of flexion to 70 degrees, Board member consensus was that the NARSUM’s record of “approximately 60 degrees” was more likely than not an actual measurement within the later stated range above; and, therefore is rated above the 60 degree criteria level. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) and §4.7 (higher of two ratings), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic LBP condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130719, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record










                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20140018966 (PD201301030)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01136

    Original file (PD 2013 01136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is also noted that the 30 degrees flexion from the NARSUM is incongruent with the recorded ROM in other planes, and would expected to be associated with other exam findings not noted (spasm, guarding, and abnormal contour).Finally, the imprecise language used by the NARSUM examiner in describing his ROM measurements must be considered somewhat of a probative value detractor with regard to VASRD §4.46 (accurate measurement).After protracted deliberation in consideration of all of these...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00462

    Original file (PD2013 00462.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board noted the first VA C&P examination was well outside the 12-month time frame specified in DoDI 6040.44 regarding VA evaluations for Board consideration to have significant probative value in the Board’s rating recommendation, and the CI did indicate that his pain was “worse” further suggesting it did not reflect his condition at separation. Mental Health Review Contended MH Conditions .Although the CI elaborated no contention related to any MH condition, it is noted that he...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01451

    Original file (PD 2012 01451.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating for disability at the time of separation. A physical therapy note, 9 months prior to separation, recorded normal gait, and mild tenderness. The Board noted the VA chose to rate the condition under the new spine rules that went into effect after the CI was separated.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02744

    Original file (PD-2013-02744.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The low back and right hip conditions, characterized as “lumbago” and “right femoral neck stress fracture,” were the only conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) without neurologic deficit” and “chronic right hip pain status post stress fracture”as unfitting, rated 10%each, referencing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy for the hip with likely application of the Veterans...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01045

    Original file (PD2012 01045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At that June 2003 MEB exam, the CI had full ROM, with no significant spasm or paraspinous tenderness.After a thorough review of the evidence in the service treatment record (STR), the Board determined that IAW VASRD §4.71a, the CI’s LBP condition was best described as “slight.” TheSTR did not show sufficient evidence to support classifying the LBP condition as “moderate” or “severe.”The CI’s LBP condition did indeed get worse following separation, but the Board must adjudicate based on the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01892

    Original file (PD-2013-01892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the worsening impairment with which her service-connected condition burdens her; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01858

    Original file (PD-2013-01858.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The Informal PEBadjudicated “chronic back pain with T12 compression fracture without neurologic abnormality, combined thoracolumbar range-of- motion [ROM] of 225 degrees” and “chronic pain of left shoulder”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%, citing use of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy criteria for the left shoulder pain. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01837

    Original file (PD-2013-01837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20040610VA -(STR) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Low Back Pain without Neurologic Abnormality5299-523710%Degenerative Disc Disease of the Lumbar Spine at L5 (claimed as chronic low back pain)524210%STROther x 0Other x 1 Rating: 10%Combined Rating: 10%Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20041026 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00618

    Original file (PD2012 00618.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The low back condition, characterized as “spondylolisthesis (grade I),” “bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (S1) and “degenerative disc disease L5-S1,”was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) In accordance with (IAW)AR 40-501.The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain with injury”as unfitting rated at0%. In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00055

    Original file (PD 2013 00055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The chronic low back condition, characterized as “chronic low back pain, EPTS with service aggravation” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain” as unfitting and rated it at 10%. The PEB rated the unfitting chronic LBP10% (coded 5242, degenerative arthritis of the spine) with application of the VASRD general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine. ...